Priority and More

نویسندگان

  • Allan Borodin
  • David Cashman
چکیده

Many known efficient algorithms for computational problems can be classified into a few algorithm paradigms: greedy algorithms, divide-and-conquer, dynamic programming, linear programming and backtracking algorithms. An approach to evaluating different algorithm paradigms is to show approximability of a specific computational problem in each paradigm. A ncessary component of such evaluation is to formalize a precise model for each algorithm paradigm. Using the precise model, one can compare different algorithm paradigms. For a particular optimization problem, it may be the case that it can be proved that greedy algorithms captured by a specific model cannot be approximated beyond a certain ratio whereas algorithms within another model can. This provides not only the theoretical separation of these models but also practical guides to designing algorithms by ruling out possibilities. Furthermore, the formal model gives us a better understanding of the structure of the computational problem at hand. Using the model, one can joyfully wander between lower and upper bound. Because of its simplicity and efficiency on many computational problems, the greedy algorithm paradigm is one of most important tool in designing algorithms. Recently, Borodin, Nielsen and Rackoff, [3], introduced a model called priority algorithms which captures any reasonable greedy or greedy-like algorithms. Along with the idea of an optimal solution these algorithms also provide the idea of an approximation algorithm. The primal-dual and local ratio approaches for approximation algorithms are also two fundamental algorithm design paradigms. These two approaches usually encompass the greedy approach. That is, if one can prove arbitrary large competitive ratio in priority algorithm framework, one can hope to find a better approximation ratio using a more powerful algorithm paradigm such as primaldual and local ratio design paradigms. The paper of Allan Borodin, David Cashman, and Avner Magen [2] formalized a formal computational model that captures both the primal-dual and the local ratio approaches. This model is called a stack algorithm.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”

As healthcare resources become increasingly scarce due to growing demand and stagnating budgets, the need for effective priority setting and resource allocation will become ever more critical to providing sustainable care to patients. While societal values should certainly play a part in guiding these processes, the methodology used to capture these values need not necessarily be limited to mul...

متن کامل

Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness

Priority setting of health interventions is generally considered as a valuable approach to support low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in their strive for universal health coverage (UHC). However, present initiatives on priority setting are mainly geared towards the development of more cost-effectiveness information, and this evidence does not sufficiently support countries to make optimal...

متن کامل

The No-Destination Ship of Priority-Setting in Healthcare: A Call for More Democracy

In dealing with scarcity of resources within healthcare systems, decision-makers inevitably have to make choices about which services to fund. Setting priorities represents a challenging task that requires systematic, explicit and transparent methodologies with focus on economic efficiency. In addition, the engagement of the general public in the process of decision-making has been regarded as ...

متن کامل

Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Universal Health Coverage: Broadening the Scope; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”

Universal health coverage (UHC) is high on the global health agenda, and priority setting is fundamental to the fair and efficient pursuit of this goal. In a recent editorial, Rob Baltussen and colleagues point to the need to go beyond evidence on cost-effectiveness and call for evidence-informed deliberative processes when setting priorities for UHC. Such processes are crucial at every step on...

متن کامل

Does the Narrative About the Use of Evidence in Priority Setting Vary Across Health Programs Within the Health Sector: A Case Study of 6 Programs in a Low-Income National Healthcare System

Background There is a growing body of literature on evidence-informed priority setting. However, the literature on the use of evidence when setting healthcare priorities in low-income countries (LICs), tends to treat the healthcare system (HCS) as a single unit, despite the existence of multiple programs within the HCS, some of whic...

متن کامل

Assessing and Improving Performance: A Longitudinal Evaluation of Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in a Canadian Health Region

Background In order to meet the challenges presented by increasing demand and scarcity of resources, healthcare organizations are faced with difficult decisions related to resource allocation. Tools to facilitate evaluation and improvement of these processes could enable greater transparency and more optimal distribution of resources.   Methods The Resource Allocation Performance Assessment Too...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009